Justice-sector AI / Brazil / TJMA
IDENTIFICADOR DE ESTRUTURA DE PETIÇÃO INICIAL TJMA · Tribunal or adjudicator · 2024
status as stated: Em desenvolvimento Official survey entry Search and retrieval
In CNJ's 2024 judicial AI survey, TJMA reported IDENTIFICADOR DE ESTRUTURA DE PETIÇÃO INICIAL with status “Em desenvolvimento”. The entry describes the project as: O projeto consiste no desenvolvimento de uma ferramenta de segmentação automática de petições iniciais em suas principais partes (Fato, Tese e Pedido). O objetivo é contribuir para a automação de tarefas no setor…
Status date given by the source: 2024.
Official record paineisanalytics.cnj.jus.br Read 2026-09-07 · primary document readFound via CNJ 2024 AI survey dashboard Notes Brazil Lei 9.610/1998 art. 8; extracted from the official CNJ Qlik table 'detalhes' for 2024; dashboard app 51977be5-96d0-4362-98ff-ed3eb3337781; project ID 8909:09:03. Official act of a public body, not subject to copyright in its jurisdiction (see notes). The status word is the source's own on the read date; a pilot is not recorded as a deployment and a contract is not recorded as use. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record .
compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial team method as of 2026-09-07 v0.1.1 coding CC BY 4.0 JSON Hugging Face GitHub
Disclaimer · Last checked 2026-09-07
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation.
Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice. Full disclaimer → · Something wrong? Report it →