Justice-sector AI / Brazil / TJMA
SUMARIZAÇÃO COM AJUSTE DE PREFERÊNCIA TJMA · Tribunal or adjudicator · 2024
status as stated: Em desenvolvimento Official survey entry Generative AI
In CNJ's 2024 judicial AI survey, TJMA reported SUMARIZAÇÃO COM AJUSTE DE PREFERÊNCIA with status “Em desenvolvimento”. The entry describes the project as: Sumarização para extração automática de pontos-chave de documentos para facilitar a busca de informações relevantes, evitando a necessidade de leitura integral do conteúdo.
Status date given by the source: 2024.
Official record paineisanalytics.cnj.jus.br Read 2026-09-07 · primary document readFound via CNJ 2024 AI survey dashboard Notes Brazil Lei 9.610/1998 art. 8; extracted from the official CNJ Qlik table 'detalhes' for 2024; dashboard app 51977be5-96d0-4362-98ff-ed3eb3337781; project ID 8909:09:03. Official act of a public body, not subject to copyright in its jurisdiction (see notes). The status word is the source's own on the read date; a pilot is not recorded as a deployment and a contract is not recorded as use. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record .
compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial team method as of 2026-09-07 v0.1.1 coding CC BY 4.0 JSON Hugging Face GitHub
Disclaimer · Last checked 2026-09-07
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation.
Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice. Full disclaimer → · Something wrong? Report it →