Skip to content

Enforcement register / entity

Jointly Solutions Ltd.

2 official actions on the record, from Law Society of British Columbia, Law Society of Ontario. This page lists what regulators and courts have done, in date order, with the outcome of each; it is not a description or assessment of the service. Jointly Solutions Ltd. may reply or add a later disposition.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub

  1. · Law Society of British Columbia · Sandbox or licence authorisation
    innovation sandbox no-action letter

    No-action letter allows Jointly to automate family-law agreement creation subject to conditions.

    The Law Society of British Columbia issues Jointly Solutions Ltd. a no-action letter dated July 17, 2025. The letter allows Jointly to offer family-law services through an online platform that automates creation of cohabitation, prenuptial, marriage and separation agreements for self-represented parties, subject to sandbox conditions.

  2. · Law Society of Ontario · Sandbox or licence authorisation
    A2I update report approval listing

    Listed in the June 2025 A2I update as approved since the 2024 report.

    The Law Society of Ontario’s June 25, 2025 A2I update report lists Jointly among participants approved since the 2024 report. The report describes an online platform that uses technology to guide Ontario residents through questions and create legally compliant, personalized relationship agreements in family-law matters.

Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.