Skip to content

Enforcement register / entity

smartlaw

1 official action on the record, from Bundesgerichtshof. This page lists what regulators and courts have done, in date order, with the outcome of each; it is not a description or assessment of the service. smartlaw may reply or add a later disposition.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub

  1. · Bundesgerichtshof · Unauthorized-practice litigation
    civil judgment on legal-document generator

    Revision dismissed; the software-driven contract-document generator is held not to provide an impermissible legal service under the RDG.

    The Bundesgerichtshof decides the smartlaw contract-document generator case on September 9, 2021. The court dismisses the bar chamber’s appeal and holds that a software-driven generator using a question-and-answer system and stored text modules does not provide an impermissible legal service under Germany’s Rechtsdienstleistungsgesetz.

Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.