Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / EU AI Act / Chapter IX · Section 3

Article 75b
Commitments

Chapter IX — Post-market monitoring by providers and post-market monitoring plan for high-risk AI systems, Section 3 — Market surveillance and control of AI systems in the Union market. 5 distinct duties, powers or definitions are coded from this article, applying from 2026-08-02.

Inserted by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI), in force 2026-07-27. The text below is the consolidated version of 27 July 2026; the amending regulation are on EUR-Lex.

official text: EUR-Lex (consolidated 27 Jul 2026) · text © European Union (Decision 2011/833/EU) · coding CC BY 4.0 · data: obligations.json · Hugging Face · GitHub

The text

If, during proceedings under Article 75a(2), the operator concerned offers commitments to ensure compliance with the relevant provisions of this Regulation, the AI Office may, by decision, make those commitments binding on the operator concerned and declare that there are no further grounds for action. The AI Office may, upon request or on its own initiative, reopen the proceedings where:

  1. (a)there has been a material change in any of the facts on which the decision was based;
  2. (b)the operator acts contrary to its commitments; or
  3. (c)the decision was based on incomplete, incorrect or misleading information provided by the operator concerned.

Where the AI Office considers that the commitments offered by the operator concerned are unable to ensure effective compliance with the relevant provisions of this Regulation, it shall reject those commitments in a reasoned decision when concluding the proceedings.

What it requires, coded

SafeLegalAI's reading of each duty in this article: who, what, from when, under which fine tier, and whether it reaches a firm, chambers, court or legal-AI vendor. Descriptive, not advice; the quoted words are the Regulation's.

  1. Art. 75bEnforcement powerNot tier-specific

    During Article 75a(2) proceedings, if the operator offers commitments to ensure compliance, the AI Office may make them binding and declare no further grounds for action.

    "the AI Office may, by decision, make those commitments binding on the operator concerned and declare that there are no further grounds for action."
    Who
    AI Office, Any operator
    From
    (Art. 113 second subparagraph (general application))
    Legal practice
    Reaches legal-AI vendors or public bodies — Operators of supervised legal-AI systems may resolve AI Office proceedings through binding commitments.
    See
    Art. 75a(2)

  2. Art. 75bEnforcement powerNot tier-specific

    Where offered commitments cannot ensure effective compliance with the AI Act, the AI Office must reject them in a reasoned decision when concluding proceedings.

    "it shall reject those commitments in a reasoned decision when concluding the proceedings."
    Who
    AI Office
    From
    (Art. 113 second subparagraph (general application))
    Legal practice
    Reaches legal-AI vendors or public bodies — AI Office proceedings against supervised legal-AI operators need not end through inadequate commitments.
    See
    Art. 75b

  3. Art. 75b (a)Enforcement powerNot tier-specific

    The AI Office may reopen commitment proceedings where there has been a material change in the facts on which its decision was based.

    "there has been a material change in any of the facts on which the decision was based;"
    Who
    AI Office
    From
    (Art. 113 second subparagraph (general application))
    Legal practice
    Reaches legal-AI vendors or public bodies — AI Office commitments involving legal-AI operators can be reopened if the factual basis materially changes.
    See
    Art. 75b

  4. Art. 75b (b)Enforcement powerNot tier-specific

    The AI Office may reopen proceedings where the operator acts contrary to commitments that were made binding.

    "the operator acts contrary to its commitments;"
    Who
    AI Office, Any operator
    From
    (Art. 113 second subparagraph (general application))
    Legal practice
    Reaches legal-AI vendors or public bodies — A supervised legal-AI operator that breaches commitments can face reopened AI Office proceedings.
    See
    Art. 75b

  5. Art. 75b (c)Enforcement powerNot tier-specific

    The AI Office may reopen proceedings where its commitment decision was based on incomplete, incorrect or misleading information from the operator.

    "the decision was based on incomplete, incorrect or misleading information provided by the operator concerned."
    Who
    AI Office, Any operator
    From
    (Art. 113 second subparagraph (general application))
    Legal practice
    Reaches legal-AI vendors or public bodies — Incomplete or misleading information from a legal-AI operator can reopen AI Office proceedings.
    See
    Art. 75b

Cite

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 75b (Commitments), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, consolidated text of 27 July 2026, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/2026-07-27/eng#art_75b — text © European Union; only the Official Journal is authentic. Coding: SafeLegalAI (published by Cognesio LLP), "EU AI Act, structured", safelegalai.com/regulation/eu-ai-act/article-75b, accessed 2026-09-08, CC BY 4.0.