Vendor
ChatGPT is the assistant built by OpenAI and is the AI tool most often named in the incident tracker. This page collects every SafeLegalAI article that names ChatGPT or OpenAI, next to the governance facts recorded for ChatGPT Enterprise.
ChatGPT Enterprise / Team · OpenAI
Last checked 2026-09-11
News·News brief
The EAT criticised an unchecked ChatGPT filing, warned of future rejection and allowed one appeal ground to proceed. The ruling is dated 17 September.
Briefs·Weekly briefingIssue
Issue 2: the SDT's first AI-citation case, 476 US court rows on record, California SB 574 with the Governor, Germany, Poland and Ireland AI Act laws.
Research·Report
17 rulings and opinions on AI privilege, discovery and AI-generated evidence, 2024 to 2026, coded by question, plus what five note-taker vendors say they keep.
Research·Report
150 tracker rows, 45 with a stated figure: USD 371,542 across 34 US orders, median USD 5,000; 48 regulator referrals, 5 verified dispositions.
Research·Report
12 consumer legal-AI services on one schema, 41 self-represented rows in the incident tracker, two docket studies of AI pro se filings, and the regulators.
Research·Report
106 instruments on judges' AI use and 11 decisions where an adjudicator relied on fabricated authority: 10 countries bind judges, 22 guide, 6 are drafting.
Research·Report
1 July to 30 September 2026: 87 tracker incidents in 11 jurisdictions, USD 142,729 in stated US penalties, 26 regulator referrals or dispositions.
Research·Analysis
The first reported UK case of AI-invented case law: a litigant cited nine ChatGPT-fabricated decisions to the Tax Tribunal, which found them fake.
Research·Report
Every published measurement of legal-AI error on one schema, set against the vendor claims: 17% to 33% for research tools, 43% to 88% for general models.
Research·Analysis
An Ontario lawyer filed a ChatGPT-fabricated factum, then lied about writing it — and drew a criminal-contempt referral to the Attorney General.
Research·Analysis
Two New York attorneys, six ChatGPT-invented cases, and a $5,000 sanction: the June 2023 ruling that created the legal AI hallucination era.
Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.
