Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Dalton Gage Hill v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority

·United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma·US-FEDSanctionsprovisional

On 2026-05-21, in Dalton Gage Hill v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, the Western District of Oklahoma magistrate judge recommended denying the motion to vacate and described earlier Rule 11 sanctions proceedings against counsel. Counsel filed a response using quotations that did not appear in the cited source, nonexistent or hallucinated authorities, and authorities used for.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Date
2026-05-21
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
GAI
Conduct
Counsel filed a response using quotations that did not appear in the cited source, nonexistent or hallucinated authorities, and authorities used for propositions they did not support.
Outcome
Sanctions
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Dalton Gage Hill v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority”, safelegalai.com/tracker/dalton-gage-hill-v-oklahoma-county-criminal-justice-authority (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →