Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Doe 1, et al. v. Shirley Lai, et al.
·United States District Court for the Central District of California·US-FEDSanctionsprovisional
Central District of California on 2026-02-17 found defense counsel attributed a quotation to Headley that the court could not locate and cited Dann for a proposition the court could not find. The court denied the motion to dismiss, granted judicial notice, and ordered defense counsel to produce authorities or explain why sanctions should not issue.
- Court
- United States District Court for the Central District of California
- Date
- 2026-02-17
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Defense counsel attributed a quotation to Headley that the court could not locate and cited Dann for a proposition the court could not find.
- Outcome
- Sanctions
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance Services, No. CV-23-02090-PHX-DWL (D. Ariz.)2026-08-24 · US District Court for the District of Arizona · SanctionsAfter finding two fabricated Ninth Circuit quotations in a fee-opposition brief, the US District Court for the District of Arizona learned that plaintiff's counsel had used ChatGPT and uncovered further invented quotati…
- Chapman v. City of Priceville, No. 5:26-cv-84-HDM (N.D. Ala.)2026-08-12 · US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama · SanctionsThe US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, the same district that sanctioned Butler Snow in Johnson v. Dunn, publicly reprimanded civil-rights plaintiff's lawyer Scott Morro for a brief containing two f…
- In re BFI Waste Systems of Tennessee (City of Murfreesboro v. BFI), No. 3:22-cv-00605 (M.D. Tenn.)2026-08-06 · US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division · SanctionsThe US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee publicly reprimanded attorney Louis Ringger III and ordered him to pay USD 1,500 to the Clerk after a brief in landfill litigation quoted cases that did not say…
- Barteca Holdings LLC v. Tacobarn Newtown LLC, No. 3:26-cv-00250 (D. Conn.)2026-08-04 · US District Court for the District of Connecticut · SanctionsIn a restaurant trade-dress dispute, the US District Court for the District of Connecticut sanctioned defense counsel USD 3,500 and referred him for discipline after a brief polished with Open Law, Claude and ChatGPT mi…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Doe 1, et al. v. Shirley Lai, et al.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/doe-1-et-al-v-shirley-lai-et-al (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.