Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
In re: Latasha Transrina Kebe
·United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida·US-FEDCosts orderprovisional
On 2026-05-13, in In re: Latasha Transrina Kebe, the Southern District of Florida Bankruptcy Court imposed a Rule 9011 sanction against debtor's counsel equal to ten percent of the reply-fee award. Counsel filed a motion using authorities used for propositions they did not support.
- Court
- United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida
- Date
- 2026-06-30
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- The May 13 order identified citation errors in the debtor’s response that were acknowledged in a corrective notice and imposed a Rule 9011 sanction equal to 10% of the later-fixed Reply Award. The June 30 order established that sanction at $2,231.84 against Chad T. Van Horn and Van Horn Law Group.
- Outcome
- Costs order
- Penalty
- US$2,231.84
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Full Standard Properties v. SJ 6070, No. 5:25-cv-09451 (N.D. Cal.)2026-08-20 · US District Court for the Northern District of California · Costs orderIn the US District Court for the Northern District of California, Judge Freeman discharged an order to show cause against plaintiff's counsel who had cited nonexistent cases, after counsel reimbursed USD 14,500 in fees…
- Forney v. Township of Cary, North Carolina, No. 5:25-CV-00738-M (E.D.N.C.)2026-08-03 · US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina · Costs orderHaving warned the same lawyer in a prior action, the chief judge of the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina used inherent authority to order him to pay the Town of Cary's fees for a brief built…
- Hill v. Foundation Media LLC, No. 1:25-cv-05947 (AS) (S.D.N.Y. 2026)2026-09-29 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York · WarningIn New York federal court, Judge Arun Subramanian ordered defence counsel to explain AI-affected quotations in a response brief, took no further action, and called the episode a wakeup call. Counsel's 1 October letter d…
- Aguilar v. The Crawford Group, Inc., No. 1:25-cv-12395-AK (D. Mass. 2026)2026-09-25 · United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts · SanctionsIn Massachusetts federal court, Judge Angel Kelley sanctioned California-barred counsel under Rule 11 for fictitious and misattributed citations across three briefs. His firm must pay the Enterprise defendants' fees and…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “In re: Latasha Transrina Kebe”, safelegalai.com/tracker/in-re-latasha-transrina-kebe (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.