Incident Tracker / United States (state)
In re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry
·Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·US-STATEFineprovisional
The Supreme Court of Puerto Rico on 2026-04-21 admonished counsel for unverified or fabricated authorities and cautioned against repeating the citation misconduct in In re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry. Counsel filed a submission with six fabricated case citations, including Otero-Burgos v. Inter Med. Supplies.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
- Date
- 2026-04-21
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Counsel filed a submission with six fabricated case citations, including Otero-Burgos v. Inter Med. Supplies and Rosado v. ELA.
- Outcome
- Fine
- Penalty
- US$1,000
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Capital Standard, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association, No. 2D2024-1392 (Fla. 2d DCA)2026-08-21 · Florida Second District Court of Appeal · FineFlorida's Second District Court of Appeal affirmed a foreclosure-related declaratory judgment and, in a separate section citing the Charlotin database, fined appellant's counsel USD 1,500, awarded U.S. Bank its appellat…
- Scott v. Illinois Human Rights Commission, 2026 IL App (1st) 2514622026-07-28 · Appellate Court of Illinois, First District · FineThe Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, affirmed dismissal of a Starbucks employee's discrimination charge and sanctioned her lawyer USD 15,000 under Supreme Court Rule 375 for ten AI-hallucinated statutory quo…
- Del Biaggio v. Bansen, No. A174647 (Cal. Ct. App., 1st Dist., Div. 4)2026-07-10 · California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Four · FineIn a published opinion in an attorney-fee appeal, the California Court of Appeal, First District, fined attorney Floyd USD 1,500 for misstatements and false quotations attributed to the Gorman and PLCM decisions. The ca…
- Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., No. 24-CV-1099 (D.C. Ct. App.)2026-09-03 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Regulatory referralIn the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Deutsche Bank's appellee brief cited four nonexistent authorities after counsel used Google's generative AI search tool without verification. The court struck the brief, ref…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “In re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry”, safelegalai.com/tracker/in-re-mar-a-v-irizarry-centeno-anissa-m-bonilla-irizarry (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.