Incident Tracker / United States (state)
In re the Marriage of Monson
·Iowa Court of Appeals·US-STATEWarningprovisional
The Iowa Court of Appeals identifies likely AI misuse in a self-represented divorce appellant’s brief, including nonexistent and mischaracterized authorities. The court still considers discernible claims, affirms the decree, and warns that inaccurate AI-assisted filings waste resources. Docket 25-1029. The decision is dated 2026-09-02 and was read from a public copy of the court's document.
- Court
- Iowa Court of Appeals
- Date
- 2026-09-02
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Caroline Monson repeatedly cited an Iowa case that does not exist and cited other cases and statutes that do not support the asserted propositions.
- Outcome
- Warning
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- State v. Presti, No. CAAP-24-0000826 (Haw. Ct. App.)2026-08-31 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · WarningOn a Hawaii criminal appeal, self-represented appellant Cody Presti filed an opening brief citing 95 cases, 11 of which the court could not locate; six citations pointed to unrelated decisions. The Intermediate Court of…
- Noble v. WMC Mortgage Corp., 2026 IL App (1st) 251168-U2026-08-28 · Appellate Court of Illinois, First District · WarningIn Illinois, self-represented litigant Sanja Noble's mortgage appeal brief included a hallucinated citation to Ferguson v. Georges for the standard of review. The Appellate Court found the citation actually led to Peopl…
- Salloum v. Department of Transportation, No. 25CA1748 (Colo. App.)2026-08-27 · Colorado Court of Appeals · WarningIn Colorado, self-represented appellant Ayman Salloum filed an opening brief citing three authorities the Court of Appeals could not verify, including one dated in the future. Applying Al-Hamim's warning on generative-A…
- Asiedu v. Eastlund, Nos. A25-2106, A26-0532 (Minn. Ct. App.)2026-09-08 · Minnesota Court of Appeals · SanctionsIn Minnesota Court of Appeals, self-represented litigant Michael Asiedu admitted he used artificial intelligence for research and did not verify citations. The district court found the filings cited non-existent cases o…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “In re the Marriage of Monson”, safelegalai.com/tracker/in-re-the-marriage-of-monson (accessed 2026-09-11). Data: CC BY 4.0.