Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Miller v. Regions Bank

·United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama·US-FEDSuspensionprovisional

On 2026-05-21, in Jackie L. Miller v. Regions Bank, the Northern District of Alabama disqualified counsel from the case and from appearing before the judge for six months and referred the order to bar authorities. Counsel submitted a filing using quotations that did not appear in the cited source.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Date
2026-05-21
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
ChatGPT
Conduct
Attorney H. Gregory Harp filed four false quotations and then deleted his ChatGPT account after being ordered to produce his ChatGPT history. The court inferred ChatGPT generated the false quotations and imposed suspension, disqualification, reprimand, and notice to disciplinary authorities.
Outcome
Suspension
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • Johnson v. Dunn, No. 2:21-cv-01701-AMM (N.D. Ala.), 792 F. Supp. 3d 12412025-07-23 · US District Court, Northern District of Alabama (Southern Division) · SanctionsIn the Northern District of Alabama, Judge Anna M. Manasco publicly reprimanded Butler Snow attorneys Matthew B. Reeves, William J. Cranford and William R. Lunsford for filing two motions containing citations hallucinat…
  • Mata v Avianca, Inc.2023-06-22 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · SanctionsThe origin case of legal AI hallucination sanctions: two New York attorneys were fined $5,000 after citing six ChatGPT-invented cases in a personal-injury filing and persisting after the fabrications were questioned, pr…
  • Parker v Forsyth NNO and Others (1585/20) [2023] ZAGPRD 12023-06-29 · Regional Court, Johannesburg (Gauteng Regional Division) · Costs orderIn South Africa, the Johannesburg Regional Court found that the plaintiff's attorneys supplied opposing lawyers with fictitious ChatGPT authorities without verification. It found no intention to mislead the court and or…
  • Hill v. Foundation Media LLC, No. 1:25-cv-05947 (AS) (S.D.N.Y. 2026)2026-09-29 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York · WarningIn New York federal court, Judge Arun Subramanian ordered defence counsel to explain AI-affected quotations in a response brief, took no further action, and called the episode a wakeup call. Counsel's 1 October letter d…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Miller v. Regions Bank”, safelegalai.com/tracker/jackie-l-miller-v-regions-bank (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →