Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi
·United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi·US-FEDPendingprovisional
The Southern District of Mississippi on 2026-05-01 admonished counsel for unverified or fabricated authorities and cautioned against repeating the citation misconduct in Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi. Counsel filed a brief with one fabricated case citation, one false case quotation, and one mischaracterized case citation, including Rodriguez v. It’s Just Lunch.
- Court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
- Date
- 2026-05-01
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Attorney Rice cited a fictitious Rodriguez case, a false Minnesota Voters Alliance quotation, and other mischaracterized authorities. The court ordered him to disclose whether AI was used and to produce the Rodriguez authority.
- Outcome
- Pending
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co. v. United States, Ct. No. 24-00221-MMB (Ct. Int'l Trade 2026)2026-09-22 · United States Court of International Trade · PendingIn the U.S. Court of International Trade, Judge M. Miller Baker ordered a Chinese exporter to substantiate brief statements that Commerce took part in a Canadian antidumping case. If it cannot, it must show cause why it…
- Falkenstein v. Niles, No. 2:26-cv-07078-SB-PD (C.D. Cal.)2026-09-03 · US District Court, Central District of California · PendingIn the US District Court for the Central District of California, defence counsel filed materials with false quotations, misplaced propositions and representations not found in the complaint. Judge Blumenfeld ordered cou…
- James v. Conley, No. 1:23-cv-24467 (S.D. Fla.)2026-08-27 · US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Magistrate Judge Elfenbein, report and recommendation) · PendingIn the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, a magistrate judge found that plaintiff's Fifth Amended Complaint pleaded nonexistent police-training publications that counsel conceded were AI hallucinati…
- Hill v. Foundation Media LLC, No. 1:25-cv-05947 (AS) (S.D.N.Y. 2026)2026-09-29 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York · WarningIn New York federal court, Judge Arun Subramanian ordered defence counsel to explain AI-affected quotations in a response brief, took no further action, and called the episode a wakeup call. Counsel's 1 October letter d…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi”, safelegalai.com/tracker/johnny-fuselier-v-john-s-riscassi (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.