Incident Tracker / United States (state)
Kateryna Maslovska v. Ekaterina Shigabetdinova
·Appellate Court of Illinois·US-STATEWarningprovisional
Illinois Appellate Court on 2026-03-11 in Kateryna Maslovska v. Ekaterina Shigabetdinova found the self-represented party's brief contained two citation defects involving mischaracterized authority. The court warned both sides to verify authorities and quotations before filing future papers in the challenged filing before resolving the pending matter.
- Court
- Appellate Court of Illinois
- Date
- 2026-03-11
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- The self-represented party's brief contained two citation defects involving mischaracterized authority.
- Outcome
- Warning
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- State v. Presti, No. CAAP-24-0000826 (Haw. Ct. App.)2026-08-31 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · WarningOn a Hawaii criminal appeal, self-represented appellant Cody Presti filed an opening brief citing 95 cases, 11 of which the court could not locate; six citations pointed to unrelated decisions. The Intermediate Court of…
- Noble v. WMC Mortgage Corp., 2026 IL App (1st) 251168-U2026-08-28 · Appellate Court of Illinois, First District · WarningIn Illinois, self-represented litigant Sanja Noble's mortgage appeal brief included a hallucinated citation to Ferguson v. Georges for the standard of review. The Appellate Court found the citation actually led to Peopl…
- Salloum v. Department of Transportation, No. 25CA1748 (Colo. App.)2026-08-27 · Colorado Court of Appeals · WarningIn Colorado, self-represented appellant Ayman Salloum filed an opening brief citing three authorities the Court of Appeals could not verify, including one dated in the future. Applying Al-Hamim's warning on generative-A…
- Kiser v. DeSimone Auto Group, No. 2428 EDA 2025 (Pa. Super. Ct.)2026-08-27 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · WarningIn Pennsylvania, counsel for Paige and Ty Kiser cited a non-existent Superior Court decision, Com. v. Reid, for an appellate issue in a consumer dispute. The Superior Court called the authority counterfeit, suggested ch…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Kateryna Maslovska v. Ekaterina Shigabetdinova”, safelegalai.com/tracker/kateryna-maslovska-v-ekaterina-shigabetdinova (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.