Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Medal v. Amazon.com Services, LLC

·United States District Court for the Western District of Washington·US-FEDPendingprovisional

Western District of Washington on 2026-03-04 in Medal v. Amazon.com Services, LLC found counsel's opening brief included erroneous citations generated by AI-based search engines, combining captions, unrelated citations, and unsupported principles. The court ordered counsel to show cause why sanctions, striking, or referral should not issue for the defective authorities.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
Date
2026-03-04
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Counsel's opening brief included erroneous citations generated by AI-based search engines, combining captions, unrelated citations, and unsupported principles.
Outcome
Pending
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • James v. Conley, No. 1:23-cv-24467 (S.D. Fla.)2026-08-27 · US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Magistrate Judge Elfenbein, report and recommendation) · PendingIn the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, a magistrate judge found that plaintiff's Fifth Amended Complaint pleaded nonexistent police-training publications that counsel conceded were AI hallucinati…
  • Booker v. The Kroger Co., No. 1:26-cv-02006-SDG (N.D. Ga.)2026-08-28 · US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division · FineThe US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia fined employment plaintiff's lawyer Christopher Johnson USD 8,000, payable to the court's sanctions fund, for citing four nonexistent or misrepresented authorit…
  • Adams v. Matrix Providers, No. 1:23-cv-01996 (D. Colo.)2026-08-27 · US District Court for the District of Colorado · FineThe US District Court for the District of Colorado fined counsel Ms Pearson USD 1,000 after her brief cited a nonexistent case and attributed a quotation to Justice Scalia from an opinion dated 2020, four years after hi…
  • Williams v. Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board, No. 4:26-cv-00433-P (N.D. Tex.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Northern District of Texas · WarningIn the Northern District of Texas, plaintiffs' counsel cited nonexistent and materially inapposite cases while trying to defeat qualified immunity. Judge Pittman called the effort borderline sanctionable, warned that ge…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Medal v. Amazon.com Services, LLC”, safelegalai.com/tracker/medal-v-amazon-com-services-llc (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →