Incident Tracker / United States (state)
T-Alexander v. Baass
·Court of Appeal of the State of California, Sixth Appellate District·US-STATEWarningprovisional
The California Court of Appeal, Sixth District on 2026-04-14 admonished the self-represented appellant for unverified or fabricated authorities and cautioned against repeating the citation misconduct. The self-represented appellant filed a reply brief with one fabricated case citation and two false case quotations, including Tennessee v. Lane that do not appear in that opinion.
- Court
- Court of Appeal of the State of California, Sixth Appellate District
- Date
- 2026-04-14
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- T-Alexander’s pro se opening brief included quotations attributed to Tennessee v. Lane and People v. Superior Court (Humberto S.) that did not appear in the cited cases, and his reply brief contained numerous similar fabricated quotations; he had also acknowledged inaccurate citations in trial-court briefing.
- Outcome
- Warning
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-08
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Eric Posey v. Summer Bushnell, Docket No. 52072 (Idaho 2026)2026-09-22 · Idaho Supreme Court · WarningIn Idaho, the state supreme court affirmed Eric Posey's defamation judgment after finding Summer Bushnell's pro se appellate briefing relied on fabricated or inaccurate quotations and possibly unverified AI output. The…
- State v. Presti, No. CAAP-24-0000826 (Haw. Ct. App.)2026-08-31 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · WarningOn a Hawaii criminal appeal, self-represented appellant Cody Presti filed an opening brief citing 95 cases, 11 of which the court could not locate; six citations pointed to unrelated decisions. The Intermediate Court of…
- Noble v. WMC Mortgage Corp., 2026 IL App (1st) 251168-U2026-08-28 · Appellate Court of Illinois, First District · WarningIn Illinois, self-represented litigant Sanja Noble's mortgage appeal brief included a hallucinated citation to Ferguson v. Georges for the standard of review. The Appellate Court found the citation actually led to Peopl…
- Salloum v. Department of Transportation, No. 25CA1748 (Colo. App.)2026-08-27 · Colorado Court of Appeals · WarningIn Colorado, self-represented appellant Ayman Salloum filed an opening brief citing three authorities the Court of Appeals could not verify, including one dated in the future. Applying Al-Hamim's warning on generative-A…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “T-Alexander v. Baass”, safelegalai.com/tracker/michael-t-alexander-v-michelle-baass-et-al (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.