Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Moulder v. Davis School District
On 2026-03-23, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah required AI-related CLE and payment of $1,525.50 already agreed to reimburse fees for two nonexistent cases and a nonexistent quotation. Counsel submitted a brief with two false quotations and fabricated or nonexistent authorities.
- Court
- United States District Court for the District of Utah
- Date
- 2026-03-23
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Plaintiffs' counsel cited two non-existent cases and one non-existent quote in briefing and admitted using AI without independent verification.
- Outcome
- Sanctions
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-08
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Aguilar v. The Crawford Group, Inc., No. 1:25-cv-12395-AK (D. Mass. 2026)2026-09-25 · United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts · SanctionsIn Massachusetts federal court, Judge Angel Kelley sanctioned California-barred counsel under Rule 11 for fictitious and misattributed citations across three briefs. His firm must pay the Enterprise defendants' fees and…
- Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance Services, No. CV-23-02090-PHX-DWL (D. Ariz.)2026-08-24 · US District Court for the District of Arizona · SanctionsAfter finding two fabricated Ninth Circuit quotations in a fee-opposition brief, the US District Court for the District of Arizona learned that plaintiff's counsel had used ChatGPT and uncovered further invented quotati…
- Chapman v. City of Priceville, No. 5:26-cv-84-HDM (N.D. Ala.)2026-08-12 · US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama · SanctionsThe US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, the same district that sanctioned Butler Snow in Johnson v. Dunn, publicly reprimanded civil-rights plaintiff's lawyer Scott Morro for a brief containing two f…
- In re BFI Waste Systems of Tennessee (City of Murfreesboro v. BFI), No. 3:22-cv-00605 (M.D. Tenn.)2026-08-06 · US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division · SanctionsThe US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee publicly reprimanded attorney Louis Ringger III and ordered him to pay USD 1,500 to the Clerk after a brief in landfill litigation quoted cases that did not say…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Moulder v. Davis School District”, safelegalai.com/tracker/nicholas-and-barbara-moulder-v-davis-school-district-on-behalf-of-m-m (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.