Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Nydia Rosario v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company

·United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania·US-FEDSanctionsprovisional

Eastern District of Pennsylvania on 2026-02-13 in Nydia Rosario v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company found counsel's brief contained five citation defects, including Id. at *2-3, Kiessling v. State Farm and Santiago v. Warminster Twp, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations. The court ordered counsel to share the decision with the firm and address the citation-verification failure internally.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Date
2026-02-13
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Liberty Mutual’s counsel’s brief contained incorrect reporter volumes, incorrect pincites, misquoted language, omitted pincites, incomplete electronic citations, and misidentified captions.
Outcome
Sanctions
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-08

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Nydia Rosario v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company”, safelegalai.com/tracker/nydia-rosario-v-liberty-mutual-personal-insurance-company (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →