Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Sherwood v. County of Botetourt, Virginia

·United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia·US-FEDDismissalprovisional

On 2026-05-20, in Sherwood v. County of Botetourt, Virginia, et al, the Western District of Virginia granted dismissal of most claims and warned that any future filing must be supported by real law. Counsel cited Peal v. Commonwealth even though the court found the authority did not exist.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Date
2026-05-21
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
The Sherwoods’ counsel filed pleadings containing nonexistent statutory language, fictitious cases such as Peal v. Commonwealth, false quotations, and misstatements of law. Counsel could not explain the citations when asked whether they came from an AI tool.
Outcome
Dismissal
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Sherwood v. County of Botetourt, Virginia”, safelegalai.com/tracker/sherwood-v-county-of-botetourt-virginia-et-al (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →