Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
The Advocates for Human Rights and L.H.M. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al.
·U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota·US-FEDOtherprovisional
On 2026-03-26, U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota rejected defendants’ heightened-injunction argument after identifying misquotations and miscites in their brief and receiving unsatisfactory explanations at the hearing. Counsel submitted a brief with false quotations. The remedy followed the citation failures in that filing.
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
- Date
- 2026-03-26
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- The brief used false quotations that the court found nonexistent, misquoted, or unsupported for the propositions asserted.
- Outcome
- Other
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- In re Brian E. Mitchell, USPTO Proceeding No. D2026-162026-07-27 · US Patent and Trademark Office, Office of Enrollment and Discipline · OtherThe US Patent and Trademark Office's Office of Enrollment and Discipline publicly reprimanded California patent attorney Brian Mitchell, whose AI-drafted claim-construction chart in a federal patent case cited nonexiste…
- United States v. Cohen, No. 18-CR-602 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y.)2024-03-20 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · OtherIn the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, Judge Jesse M. Furman declined to sanction attorney David M. Schwartz, who filed a motion for Michael Cohen citing three non-existent cases that Cohen had…
- Booker v. The Kroger Co., No. 1:26-cv-02006-SDG (N.D. Ga.)2026-08-28 · US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division · FineThe US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia fined employment plaintiff's lawyer Christopher Johnson USD 8,000, payable to the court's sanctions fund, for citing four nonexistent or misrepresented authorit…
- Adams v. Matrix Providers, No. 1:23-cv-01996 (D. Colo.)2026-08-27 · US District Court for the District of Colorado · FineThe US District Court for the District of Colorado fined counsel Ms Pearson USD 1,000 after her brief cited a nonexistent case and attributed a quotation to Justice Scalia from an opinion dated 2020, four years after hi…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “The Advocates for Human Rights and L.H.M. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/the-advocates-for-human-rights-and-l-h-m-v-u-s-department-of-homeland-security-e (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.