Incident Tracker / United States (state)
Washington v. Washington
·Court of Appeals of Georgia·US-STATEWarningprovisional
On 2026-06-04, in Washington v. Washington, Court of Appeals of Georgia warned the filer that future use of false, nonexistent, or unsupported authorities may result in sanctions. A self-represented appellant filed an appellate brief using quotations that did not appear in the cited source and multiple nonexistent or hallucinated authorities.
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Georgia
- Date
- 2026-06-04
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- GAI
- Conduct
- A self-represented appellant filed an appellate brief using quotations that did not appear in the cited source and multiple nonexistent or hallucinated authorities.
- Outcome
- Warning
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- State v. Presti, No. CAAP-24-0000826 (Haw. Ct. App.)2026-08-31 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · WarningOn a Hawaii criminal appeal, self-represented appellant Cody Presti filed an opening brief citing 95 cases, 11 of which the court could not locate; six citations pointed to unrelated decisions. The Intermediate Court of…
- Noble v. WMC Mortgage Corp., 2026 IL App (1st) 251168-U2026-08-28 · Appellate Court of Illinois, First District · WarningIn Illinois, self-represented litigant Sanja Noble's mortgage appeal brief included a hallucinated citation to Ferguson v. Georges for the standard of review. The Appellate Court found the citation actually led to Peopl…
- Salloum v. Department of Transportation, No. 25CA1748 (Colo. App.)2026-08-27 · Colorado Court of Appeals · WarningIn Colorado, self-represented appellant Ayman Salloum filed an opening brief citing three authorities the Court of Appeals could not verify, including one dated in the future. Applying Al-Hamim's warning on generative-A…
- Kiser v. DeSimone Auto Group, No. 2428 EDA 2025 (Pa. Super. Ct.)2026-08-27 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · WarningIn Pennsylvania, counsel for Paige and Ty Kiser cited a non-existent Superior Court decision, Com. v. Reid, for an appellate issue in a consumer dispute. The Superior Court called the authority counterfeit, suggested ch…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Washington v. Washington”, safelegalai.com/tracker/washington-v-washington (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.