Regulation Tracker
AI rules for legal practice in Israel
As of 2026-09-04, 3 official documents govern AI use by lawyers, judges or litigants in Israel. 2 require disclosure or certification of AI use, 2 impose an explicit verification duty, and 1 prohibits some use outright. The incident tracker records 3 incidents in this jurisdiction.
Israel category map →
Israel Courts Administration
A binding internal code setting principles, operative instructions and control mechanisms for efficient, careful and responsible use of AI tools across the Israeli court system. It covers judges, registrars and administrative staff only, not lawyers or litigants, and was issued after a run of decisions exposing AI-fabricated citations.
Policy · Verification duty · Confidentiality · Disclosure · Supervision · Competence · Prohibition
2026-03-26In force
Israel Privacy Protection Authority
Draft guidance explaining how the Privacy Protection Law applies across the AI lifecycle, including training and operation. It requires a lawful basis and informed consent for personal data used in AI, transparency that data is collected via an automated AI system, DPO appointment and impact assessments, and internal policies restricting employee use of external generative AI tools.
Consultation · Client consent · Record-keeping · Risk classification · Confidentiality
2025-04-30Consultation
Israel Bar National Ethics Committee
The Israel Bar's first ethics opinion on generative AI, adopted by the National Ethics Committee as decision At/60/24 in 2024. It permits AI use but requires individual verification of AI output against external authority, bars entering client, confidential, privileged or copyright-protected material into AI platforms, and requires written client consent before client personal data enters open systems.
Ethics opinion · Verification duty · Confidentiality · Client consent · Competence · Disclosure
2024-05-07In force
Descriptive reference only: this page records what each rule requires. Missing a document? Tell us.