Skip to content

Legal Tech / Compare / E-discovery & investigations

Casepoint (CaseAssist) and Consilio Aurora Legal AI Suite: documented facts, side by side

What Casepoint LLC and Consilio LLC publish on their own pages about pricing, training on customer data, retention, certifications, data residency, contract terms, accuracy evidence and incidents on the record, as of 2026-10-07. Every cell links to the page that states it. Where a vendor publishes nothing, the cell says so — the absence is the fact. This is a record, not a ranking, review or recommendation.

as of 2026-10-07 · records: Casepoint (CaseAssist) · Consilio Aurora Legal AI Suite · tools.json (CC BY 4.0) · method: how tool records are compiled · audit rows: Casepoint (CaseAssist) · Consilio Aurora Legal AI Suite

Documented factCasepoint (CaseAssist)Casepoint LLC · checked 2026-09-11Consilio Aurora Legal AI SuiteConsilio LLC · checked 2026-09-16
Product
CategoryE-discovery & investigations · government, TAR, generative AI, FOIA, investigationsE-discovery & investigations · managed review, Sightline, Guided AI Review, privilege detection, summarisation
Built forCourts, Public sector, In-house legal, Large firms, Mid-sized firmsLarge firms, In-house legal
Model providers disclosednot disclosedWexler AI, Anthropic Claudesource
MarketsUSUS, UK, EU
Pricing
Price publishedno price publishedsourceenterprise
Seat minimumnot disclosednot disclosed
Minimum termnot disclosednot disclosed
Free trialnot disclosedsourcenot disclosed
Data
No training on customer datadocumented yessourcedocumented nosource
Zero retention with model providersnot disclosedsourcenot disclosedsource
Data residency optionsUnited Statessourcenot disclosed
Private deploymentdocumented yessourcedocumented yessource
Encryption at restdocumented yessourcenot disclosedsource
Certifications
SOC 2documented yessourcedocumented yessource
ISO 27001documented yessourcedocumented yessource
ISO 42001not disclosedsourcenot disclosedsource
HIPAAdocumented yessourcedocumented yessource
Contract
DPA offereddocumented yessourcenot disclosedsource
Sub-processor list publishednot discloseddocumented yessource
SSO / SAMLnot disclosedsourcenot disclosedsource
Breach notification window72 hourssourcenot disclosed
Terms last updatednot disclosednot disclosed
Privacy policy last updated2025-04-24source2026-08-17source
Record
Accuracy evidence publishednone publishednone published
Incidents on the recordnone recordednone recorded
Documentation last audited2026-09-062026-09-06

documented yes documented no not disclosed on the pages we read

Cite this comparison

SafeLegalAI Legal Tech Tools, "Casepoint (CaseAssist) and Consilio Aurora Legal AI Suite: documented facts", safelegalai.com/tools/compare/casepoint-vs-consilio-aurora (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0. Facts are recorded from the vendors' published pages on the dates shown; vendors may correct a record via /report.

SafeLegalAI is a research publication, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by SafeLegalAI. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice. SafeLegalAI is published by SafeLegalAI, which also builds LegalAI Space (affiliated product); LegalAI Space is listed in the directory with a permanent ownership label and is never compared, scored or counted here. Ownership policy.

Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.