Skip to content

Legal Tech / Compare / E-discovery & investigations

Consilio Aurora Legal AI Suite and Epiq AI (Epiq Discover): documented facts, side by side

What Consilio LLC and Epiq Systems, Inc. publish on their own pages about pricing, training on customer data, retention, certifications, data residency, contract terms, accuracy evidence and incidents on the record, as of 2026-10-07. Every cell links to the page that states it. Where a vendor publishes nothing, the cell says so — the absence is the fact. This is a record, not a ranking, review or recommendation.

as of 2026-10-07 · records: Consilio Aurora Legal AI Suite · Epiq AI (Epiq Discover) · tools.json (CC BY 4.0) · method: how tool records are compiled · audit rows: Consilio Aurora Legal AI Suite · Epiq AI (Epiq Discover)

Documented factConsilio Aurora Legal AI SuiteConsilio LLC · checked 2026-09-16Epiq AI (Epiq Discover)Epiq Systems, Inc. · checked 2026-09-21
Product
CategoryE-discovery & investigations · managed review, Sightline, Guided AI Review, privilege detection, summarisationE-discovery & investigations · managed review, generative-AI review, Epiq Assist, ITAR
Built forLarge firms, In-house legalLarge firms, In-house legal, Courts
Model providers disclosedWexler AI, Anthropic ClaudesourceAzure OpenAIsource
MarketsUS, UK, EUUS
Pricing
Price publishedenterpriseenterprise
Seat minimumnot disclosednot disclosed
Minimum termnot disclosedsubscription and transactional models
Free trialnot disclosednot disclosed
Data
No training on customer datadocumented nosourcedocumented nosource
Zero retention with model providersnot disclosedsourcenot disclosedsource
Data residency optionsnot disclosedany AWS regionsource
Private deploymentdocumented yessourcenot disclosedsource
Encryption at restnot disclosedsourcenot disclosedsource
Certifications
SOC 2documented yessourcedocumented yessource
ISO 27001documented yessourcenot disclosedsource
ISO 42001not disclosedsourcenot disclosedsource
HIPAAdocumented yessourcenot disclosedsource
Contract
DPA offerednot disclosedsourcedocumented yessource
Sub-processor list publisheddocumented yessourcenot disclosed
SSO / SAMLnot disclosedsourcenot disclosedsource
Breach notification windownot disclosednot disclosed
Terms last updatednot disclosed2026-06-15source
Privacy policy last updated2026-08-17sourcenot disclosed
Record
Accuracy evidence publishednone publishednone published
Incidents on the recordnone recorded1 recordedrecord
Documentation last audited2026-09-062026-09-06

documented yes documented no not disclosed on the pages we read

Cite this comparison

SafeLegalAI Legal Tech Tools, "Consilio Aurora Legal AI Suite and Epiq AI (Epiq Discover): documented facts", safelegalai.com/tools/compare/consilio-aurora-vs-epiq-ai (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0. Facts are recorded from the vendors' published pages on the dates shown; vendors may correct a record via /report.

SafeLegalAI is a research publication, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by SafeLegalAI. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice. SafeLegalAI is published by SafeLegalAI, which also builds LegalAI Space (affiliated product); LegalAI Space is listed in the directory with a permanent ownership label and is never compared, scored or counted here. Ownership policy.

Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.