Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
David Thomas v. The Quikrete Companies, LLC
·United States District Court for the Western District of Texas·US-FEDNoted, no consequenceprovisional
Western District of Texas on 2026-02-26 in David Thomas v. The Quikrete Companies, LLC found counsel's summary-judgment briefing misrepresented Ash v. Flowers Foods and used hallucinated quotations that do not appear in that opinion. The magistrate judge recommended granting Quikrete summary judgment and denying plaintiffs' summary-judgment motion despite the hallucinated quotation.
- Court
- United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
- Date
- 2026-02-26
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Counsel's summary-judgment briefing misrepresented Ash v. Flowers Foods and used hallucinated quotations that do not appear in that opinion.
- Outcome
- Noted, no consequence
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-08
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Hill v. Foundation Media LLC, No. 1:25-cv-05947 (AS) (S.D.N.Y. 2026)2026-09-29 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York · WarningIn New York federal court, Judge Arun Subramanian ordered defence counsel to explain AI-affected quotations in a response brief, took no further action, and called the episode a wakeup call. Counsel's 1 October letter d…
- Aguilar v. The Crawford Group, Inc., No. 1:25-cv-12395-AK (D. Mass. 2026)2026-09-25 · United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts · SanctionsIn Massachusetts federal court, Judge Angel Kelley sanctioned California-barred counsel under Rule 11 for fictitious and misattributed citations across three briefs. His firm must pay the Enterprise defendants' fees and…
- Chirece C. v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 25-11554 (E.D. Mich. 2026)2026-09-24 · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · FineIn Michigan federal court, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Stafford fined a Social Security claimant's lawyer $500 for AI-generated fictitious citations she admitted not checking. The same lawyer had been sanctioned in July…
- Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co. v. United States, Ct. No. 24-00221-MMB (Ct. Int'l Trade 2026)2026-09-22 · United States Court of International Trade · PendingIn the U.S. Court of International Trade, Judge M. Miller Baker ordered a Chinese exporter to substantiate brief statements that Commerce took part in a Canadian antidumping case. If it cannot, it must show cause why it…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “David Thomas v. The Quikrete Companies, LLC”, safelegalai.com/tracker/david-thomas-v-the-quikrete-companies-llc (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.