Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Ebony Sherisse Lucas v. Charles W. Scharf, et al.

·United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina·US-FEDPendingprovisional

Western District of North Carolina on 2026-02-24 in Ebony Sherisse Lucas v. Charles W. Scharf, et al. found the self-represented party's brief contained 13 citation defects involving nonexistent authorities, mischaracterized authority, incorrect statutory or rule text. The court ordered the self-represented party to show cause why sanctions, striking, or referral should not issue for the defective authorities.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Date
2026-02-24
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Lucas’s response and surreply contained no less than twelve wholly fraudulent citations; her reply cited two more fake cases and one real case that did not support the asserted proposition.
Outcome
Pending
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co. v. United States, Ct. No. 24-00221-MMB (Ct. Int'l Trade 2026)2026-09-22 · United States Court of International Trade · PendingIn the U.S. Court of International Trade, Judge M. Miller Baker ordered a Chinese exporter to substantiate brief statements that Commerce took part in a Canadian antidumping case. If it cannot, it must show cause why it…
  • Carter v. City of Buffalo, No. 25-CV-740 (W.D.N.Y.)2026-09-08 · US District Court, Western District of New York · WarningIn the US District Court for the Western District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Zakkiyya Carter used case law the court said did not support her propositions, after an earlier screening order. Judge John L. Si…
  • Falkenstein v. Niles, No. 2:26-cv-07078-SB-PD (C.D. Cal.)2026-09-03 · US District Court, Central District of California · PendingIn the US District Court for the Central District of California, defence counsel filed materials with false quotations, misplaced propositions and representations not found in the complaint. Judge Blumenfeld ordered cou…
  • Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Ebony Sherisse Lucas v. Charles W. Scharf, et al.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/ebony-sherisse-lucas-v-charles-w-scharf-et-al (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →