Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Kettering Adventist Healthcare v. Sandra Collier, et al.
Southern District of Ohio on 2026-02-25 found counsel's brief contained nine citation defects, including In re Protech, 51 F.4th 714 (6th Cir. 2022), United States v. Pendergraft and Inc. v. Impact Office Prods, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations. The court found contempt, struck the defective filing, and ordered counsel to pay $7,500.
- Court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
- Date
- 2026-02-25
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Counsel's brief contained nine citation defects, including In re Protech, 51 F.4th 714 (6th Cir. 2022), United States v. Pendergraft and Inc. v. Impact Office Prods, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations.
- Outcome
- Regulatory referral
- Penalty
- US$7,500
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-08
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Akerlund v. Atlas Air, Inc. (Estate of Caviness v. Atlas Air), No. 24-11033 (11th Cir.)2026-07-10 · US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Regulatory referralIn a published opinion affirming dismissal of pilots' vaccine-mandate claims, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit condemned attorney Anthony Sabatini for briefs replete with fake and hallucinated citations,…
- Cartagena v. Dixon; Dixon v. Cartagena, Nos. 1:25-cv-03552 and 1:25-cv-05144 (S.D.N.Y.)2026-07-10 · US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis) · Regulatory referralA magistrate judge of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York struck a filing by attorney Tyrone Blackburn after finding 17 instances of quotation marks around language absent from the cited cases, p…
- Parnell v. Florida Department of Corrections, No. 25-11166 (11th Cir.)2026-07-10 · US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Regulatory referralOn the same day as Akerlund v. Atlas Air, another panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment against a prison employee and referred his lawyer for discipline after a reply brief…
- Hill v. Foundation Media LLC, No. 1:25-cv-05947 (AS) (S.D.N.Y. 2026)2026-09-29 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York · WarningIn New York federal court, Judge Arun Subramanian ordered defence counsel to explain AI-affected quotations in a response brief, took no further action, and called the episode a wakeup call. Counsel's 1 October letter d…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Kettering Adventist Healthcare v. Sandra Collier, et al.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/kettering-adventist-healthcare-v-sandra-collier-et-al (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.