Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Kettering Adventist Healthcare v. Sandra Collier, et al.
·United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio·US-FEDFineprovisional
Southern District of Ohio on 2026-02-25 found counsel's brief contained nine citation defects, including In re Protech, 51 F.4th 714 (6th Cir. 2022), United States v. Pendergraft and Inc. v. Impact Office Prods, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations. The court found contempt, struck the defective filing, and ordered counsel to pay $7,500.
- Court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
- Date
- 2026-02-25
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Counsel's brief contained nine citation defects, including In re Protech, 51 F.4th 714 (6th Cir. 2022), United States v. Pendergraft and Inc. v. Impact Office Prods, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations.
- Outcome
- Fine
- Penalty
- US$7,500
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Booker v. The Kroger Co., No. 1:26-cv-02006-SDG (N.D. Ga.)2026-08-28 · US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division · FineThe US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia fined employment plaintiff's lawyer Christopher Johnson USD 8,000, payable to the court's sanctions fund, for citing four nonexistent or misrepresented authorit…
- Adams v. Matrix Providers, No. 1:23-cv-01996 (D. Colo.)2026-08-27 · US District Court for the District of Colorado · FineThe US District Court for the District of Colorado fined counsel Ms Pearson USD 1,000 after her brief cited a nonexistent case and attributed a quotation to Justice Scalia from an opinion dated 2020, four years after hi…
- Benjamin v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 2:24-cv-7399 (LGD) (E.D.N.Y.)2025-04-24 · US District Court, Eastern District of New York · FineIn the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst fined attorney Victoria Hovsepyan $1,000 under Rule 11 after she used the AI platform ChatOn to draft a reply on a remand moti…
- James v. Conley, No. 1:23-cv-24467 (S.D. Fla.)2026-08-27 · US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Magistrate Judge Elfenbein, report and recommendation) · PendingIn the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, a magistrate judge found that plaintiff's Fifth Amended Complaint pleaded nonexistent police-training publications that counsel conceded were AI hallucinati…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Kettering Adventist Healthcare v. Sandra Collier, et al.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/kettering-adventist-healthcare-v-sandra-collier-et-al (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.