Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. Redstone
·United States District Court for the Southern District of New York·US-FEDRegulatory referralprovisional
On 2026-06-09, in LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. Redstone, the Southern District of New York awarded more than $85,000 in fees and costs and referred counsel to the district grievance committee. Counsel filed a motion using quotations that did not appear in the cited source and at least one nonexistent or hallucinated authority.
- Court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
- Date
- 2026-06-09
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- LiveVideo and counsel Alfred Constants filed motions with hallmarks of AI fabrication, including nonexistent hallucinated cases, fake quotations, and prompts appearing in filings. The court awarded fees and referred counsel to the Grievance Committee.
- Outcome
- Regulatory referral
- Penalty
- US$85,056
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Akerlund v. Atlas Air, Inc. (Estate of Caviness v. Atlas Air), No. 24-11033 (11th Cir.)2026-07-10 · US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Regulatory referralIn a published opinion affirming dismissal of pilots' vaccine-mandate claims, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit condemned attorney Anthony Sabatini for briefs replete with fake and hallucinated citations,…
- Cartagena v. Dixon; Dixon v. Cartagena, Nos. 1:25-cv-03552 and 1:25-cv-05144 (S.D.N.Y.)2026-07-10 · US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis) · Regulatory referralA magistrate judge of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York struck a filing by attorney Tyrone Blackburn after finding 17 instances of quotation marks around language absent from the cited cases, p…
- Parnell v. Florida Department of Corrections, No. 25-11166 (11th Cir.)2026-07-10 · US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Regulatory referralOn the same day as Akerlund v. Atlas Air, another panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment against a prison employee and referred his lawyer for discipline after a reply brief…
- Hill v. Foundation Media LLC, No. 1:25-cv-05947 (AS) (S.D.N.Y. 2026)2026-09-29 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York · WarningIn New York federal court, Judge Arun Subramanian ordered defence counsel to explain AI-affected quotations in a response brief, took no further action, and called the episode a wakeup call. Counsel's 1 October letter d…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. Redstone”, safelegalai.com/tracker/livevideo-ai-corp-v-redstone (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.