Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al.
·United States District Court for the District of Hawaii·US-FEDFineprovisional
The District of Hawaii on 2026-05-05 ordered counsel to pay $1,000 after oppositions contained multiple record- and case-citation errors tied to AI use. Counsel accepted responsibility for filing the client’s AI-assisted material, and the court imposed the sanction for inadequate verification duties.
- Court
- United States District Court for the District of Hawaii
- Date
- 2026-05-05
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Counsel filed oppositions with multiple record- and case-citation errors tied to AI use by the client and accepted responsibility for filing them.
- Outcome
- Fine
- Penalty
- US$1,000
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Booker v. The Kroger Co., No. 1:26-cv-02006-SDG (N.D. Ga.)2026-08-28 · US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division · FineThe US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia fined employment plaintiff's lawyer Christopher Johnson USD 8,000, payable to the court's sanctions fund, for citing four nonexistent or misrepresented authorit…
- Adams v. Matrix Providers, No. 1:23-cv-01996 (D. Colo.)2026-08-27 · US District Court for the District of Colorado · FineThe US District Court for the District of Colorado fined counsel Ms Pearson USD 1,000 after her brief cited a nonexistent case and attributed a quotation to Justice Scalia from an opinion dated 2020, four years after hi…
- Benjamin v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 2:24-cv-7399 (LGD) (E.D.N.Y.)2025-04-24 · US District Court, Eastern District of New York · FineIn the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst fined attorney Victoria Hovsepyan $1,000 under Rule 11 after she used the AI platform ChatOn to draft a reply on a remand moti…
- James v. Conley, No. 1:23-cv-24467 (S.D. Fla.)2026-08-27 · US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Magistrate Judge Elfenbein, report and recommendation) · PendingIn the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, a magistrate judge found that plaintiff's Fifth Amended Complaint pleaded nonexistent police-training publications that counsel conceded were AI hallucinati…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/moore-v-mc-architects-inc-et-al (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.