Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Najafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

·United States District Court for the Northern District of California·US-FEDSanctionsprovisional

On 2026-04-03, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed the ECOA claim with prejudice and prohibited the plaintiff from using artificial intelligence to assert legal arguments in future filings. A self-represented party submitted a complaint with multiple fabricated or nonexistent authorities and mischaracterized authorities.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Date
2026-04-03
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Plaintiff’s third amended complaint again cited cases that do not exist; the court said this was the third time and presumed artificial intelligence hallucinated the cases.
Outcome
Sanctions
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-08

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • De Ford v. Koutoulas, No. 6:22-cv-652-PGB-DCI (M.D. Fla.)2026-08-04 · US District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division · SanctionsIn the securities class action over the 'Let's Go Brandon' meme coin, the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida entered default judgment against promoter James Koutoulas as a terminating sanction. Judge P…
  • Aguilar v. The Crawford Group, Inc., No. 1:25-cv-12395-AK (D. Mass. 2026)2026-09-25 · United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts · SanctionsIn Massachusetts federal court, Judge Angel Kelley sanctioned California-barred counsel under Rule 11 for fictitious and misattributed citations across three briefs. His firm must pay the Enterprise defendants' fees and…
  • Carter v. City of Buffalo, No. 25-CV-740 (W.D.N.Y.)2026-09-08 · US District Court, Western District of New York · WarningIn the US District Court for the Western District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Zakkiyya Carter used case law the court said did not support her propositions, after an earlier screening order. Judge John L. Si…
  • Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Najafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/najafpir-v-wells-fargo-bank-n-a (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →