Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Nesbitt v. Trans Union, LLC
·United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas·US-FEDSanctionsprovisional
The Western District of Arkansas sanctions Nicholas Nesbitt in a consumer-credit case by imposing filing restrictions. The court says he relied on AI for legal research and writing, filed at least two motions with fabricated cases, apologized after a Rule 11 show-cause order, and continued filing improper papers.
- Court
- United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
- Date
- 2026-08-11
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Self-represented plaintiff relied on AI and filed at least two motions with fabricated cases plus many improper filings misrepresenting rules.
- Outcome
- Sanctions
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- De Ford v. Koutoulas, No. 6:22-cv-652-PGB-DCI (M.D. Fla.)2026-08-04 · US District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division · SanctionsIn the securities class action over the 'Let's Go Brandon' meme coin, the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida entered default judgment against promoter James Koutoulas as a terminating sanction. Judge P…
- Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…
- Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00855-JRR (D. Md.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, District of Maryland · WarningIn the District of Maryland, self-represented plaintiff Darrin Johnson again cited a case the court could not locate, after an earlier Rule 11 warning. Judge Rubin said the authority appeared to be hallucinated from gen…
- Potterf v. Wessels, No. 1:26-cv-10860-MFL-PTM (E.D. Mich.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · WarningIn the Eastern District of Michigan, self-represented plaintiffs admitted using artificial intelligence to draft objections with fictitious or erroneous citations and an invented Supreme Court quotation. Judge Leitman d…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Nesbitt v. Trans Union, LLC”, safelegalai.com/tracker/nesbitt-v-trans-union-llc (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.