Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Nesbitt v. Trans Union, LLC
·United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas·US-FEDSanctionsprovisional
The Western District of Arkansas sanctions Nicholas Nesbitt in a consumer-credit case by imposing filing restrictions. The court says he relied on AI for legal research and writing, filed at least two motions with fabricated cases, apologized after a Rule 11 show-cause order, and continued filing improper papers.
- Court
- United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
- Date
- 2026-08-11
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Self-represented plaintiff relied on AI and filed at least two motions with fabricated cases plus many improper filings misrepresenting rules.
- Outcome
- Sanctions
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-08
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- De Ford v. Koutoulas, No. 6:22-cv-652-PGB-DCI (M.D. Fla.)2026-08-04 · US District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division · SanctionsIn the securities class action over the 'Let's Go Brandon' meme coin, the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida entered default judgment against promoter James Koutoulas as a terminating sanction. Judge P…
- Aguilar v. The Crawford Group, Inc., No. 1:25-cv-12395-AK (D. Mass. 2026)2026-09-25 · United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts · SanctionsIn Massachusetts federal court, Judge Angel Kelley sanctioned California-barred counsel under Rule 11 for fictitious and misattributed citations across three briefs. His firm must pay the Enterprise defendants' fees and…
- Carter v. City of Buffalo, No. 25-CV-740 (W.D.N.Y.)2026-09-08 · US District Court, Western District of New York · WarningIn the US District Court for the Western District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Zakkiyya Carter used case law the court said did not support her propositions, after an earlier screening order. Judge John L. Si…
- Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Nesbitt v. Trans Union, LLC”, safelegalai.com/tracker/nesbitt-v-trans-union-llc (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.