Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Reaves Law Firm, PLLC v. Baker Donelson
On 2026-06-02, in Reaves Law Firm, PLLC v. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, et al, the Western District of Tennessee ordered Reaves Law Firm to pay costs for improper citations and directed counsel to send the order to professional regulators. Counsel cited Press v. Vanderbilt University even though the court found the authority did not exist.
- Court
- United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
- Date
- 2026-06-02
- Who used the AI
- Firm
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Reaves Law Firm filings contained non-existent cases, false quotations, and unsupported holdings despite notice of suspected generative-AI misuse. The court ordered fee reimbursement in an amount to be determined and referred the order to the Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility.
- Outcome
- Regulatory referral
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-08
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Akerlund v. Atlas Air, Inc. (Estate of Caviness v. Atlas Air), No. 24-11033 (11th Cir.)2026-07-10 · US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Regulatory referralIn a published opinion affirming dismissal of pilots' vaccine-mandate claims, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit condemned attorney Anthony Sabatini for briefs replete with fake and hallucinated citations,…
- Cartagena v. Dixon; Dixon v. Cartagena, Nos. 1:25-cv-03552 and 1:25-cv-05144 (S.D.N.Y.)2026-07-10 · US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis) · Regulatory referralA magistrate judge of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York struck a filing by attorney Tyrone Blackburn after finding 17 instances of quotation marks around language absent from the cited cases, p…
- Parnell v. Florida Department of Corrections, No. 25-11166 (11th Cir.)2026-07-10 · US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Regulatory referralOn the same day as Akerlund v. Atlas Air, another panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment against a prison employee and referred his lawyer for discipline after a reply brief…
- In re Prince Global Holdings Ltd., No. 26-10769 (MG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.), Sullivan & Cromwell AI-citation disclosure2026-04-18 · US Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (Chief Judge Martin Glenn) · OtherIn the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Sullivan & Cromwell disclosed on 18 April 2026 that its emergency Chapter 15 motion in In re Prince Global Holdings contained AI-hallucinated citations,…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Reaves Law Firm, PLLC v. Baker Donelson”, safelegalai.com/tracker/reaves-law-firm-pllc-v-baker-donelson-bearman-caldwell-berkowitz-pc-et-al (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.