Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Reaves Law Firm, PLLC v. Baker Donelson

·United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee·US-FEDRegulatory referralprovisional

On 2026-06-02, in Reaves Law Firm, PLLC v. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, et al, the Western District of Tennessee ordered Reaves Law Firm to pay costs for improper citations and directed counsel to send the order to professional regulators. Counsel cited Press v. Vanderbilt University even though the court found the authority did not exist.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Date
2026-06-02
Who used the AI
Firm
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Reaves Law Firm filings contained non-existent cases, false quotations, and unsupported holdings despite notice of suspected generative-AI misuse. The court ordered fee reimbursement in an amount to be determined and referred the order to the Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility.
Outcome
Regulatory referral
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-08

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Reaves Law Firm, PLLC v. Baker Donelson”, safelegalai.com/tracker/reaves-law-firm-pllc-v-baker-donelson-bearman-caldwell-berkowitz-pc-et-al (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →