Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

76 Route 6 Holdings Inc. v. Town of Yorktown, NY

·U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York·US-FEDWarningprovisional

On 2026-03-30, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the complaint and admonished counsel to verify quotations and authorities after finding nonexistent quotations and misstated precedent. Counsel submitted a complaint with The complaint quoted language from McEachin and Goel that the court found did not appear in those cases.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Date
2026-03-30
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
The complaint quoted language from McEachin and Goel that the court found did not appear in those cases.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “76 Route 6 Holdings Inc. v. Town of Yorktown, NY”, safelegalai.com/tracker/76-route-6-holdings-inc-v-town-of-yorktown-ny (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →