Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Jones v. Taylor

·United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan·US-FEDWarningprovisional

The Eastern District of Michigan on 2026-04-22 warned the self-represented plaintiff to verify legal authorities and cautioned that future hallucinated or nonexistent citations may bring sanctions in Alishia Monique Jones v. Ahmed Taylor, et al. The self-represented plaintiff filed a submission with two fabricated case citations, including Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Company v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Date
2026-04-22
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Jones’s pro se response cited Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Company v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A., 35 F.3d 1134 (6th Cir. 1994), which was not a real case, and United States v. Robinson, 305 F.3d 732, 735 (6th Cir. 2002), which appeared to be another AI-generated fake case.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • Carter v. City of Buffalo, No. 25-CV-740 (W.D.N.Y.)2026-09-08 · US District Court, Western District of New York · WarningIn the US District Court for the Western District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Zakkiyya Carter used case law the court said did not support her propositions, after an earlier screening order. Judge John L. Si…
  • Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…
  • Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00855-JRR (D. Md.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, District of Maryland · WarningIn the District of Maryland, self-represented plaintiff Darrin Johnson again cited a case the court could not locate, after an earlier Rule 11 warning. Judge Rubin said the authority appeared to be hallucinated from gen…
  • Potterf v. Wessels, No. 1:26-cv-10860-MFL-PTM (E.D. Mich.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · WarningIn the Eastern District of Michigan, self-represented plaintiffs admitted using artificial intelligence to draft objections with fictitious or erroneous citations and an invented Supreme Court quotation. Judge Leitman d…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Jones v. Taylor”, safelegalai.com/tracker/alishia-monique-jones-v-ahmed-taylor-et-al (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →