Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Burgess v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

·United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio·US-FEDWarningprovisional

The Northern District of Ohio rules on Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority’s motion to dismiss and flags a Shimola citation. The court says the cited reporter page points to another case, Shimola does not support the proposition, and future hallucinated citations may be sanctioned.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Date
2026-08-06
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Defendant cited Shimola at a reporter page for a different case and represented Shimola as supporting a proposition it did not discuss.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Burgess v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority”, safelegalai.com/tracker/burgess-v-greater-cleveland-regional-transit-authority (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →