Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Danuta Dec v. Homeland Security

·U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·US-FEDWarningprovisional

On 2026-03-30, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit admonished counsel for non-existent citations and a false quotation, but declined monetary sanctions because counsel accepted responsibility and showed contrition. Counsel submitted a brief with false quotations and fabricated or nonexistent authorities, including Jones v. Kankakee Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t and In re Nwaubani.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date
2026-03-30
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
The brief used false quotations and fabricated or nonexistent authorities, including Jones v. Kankakee Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t and In re Nwaubani, which the court found nonexistent, misquoted, or unsupported.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Danuta Dec v. Homeland Security”, safelegalai.com/tracker/danuta-dec-v-homeland-security (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →