Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Young v. Happy Money, Inc.
·United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit·US-FEDNoted, no consequenceprovisional
On 2026-04-08, U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court’s order limiting one debtor’s advocacy for the other and noted that several cited bankruptcy cases did not exist or support the argument. A self-represented party submitted a motion with fabricated or nonexistent authorities and mischaracterized authorities, including In re Cherrett and In re Pringle.
- Court
- United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
- Date
- 2026-04-08
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- The pro se Debtors cited and described In re Pringle, In re Johnson, and In re Steward as authorities that did not exist as cited or described; the real cases retrieved by the citations concerned unrelated issues, and In re Cherrett did not involve sanctions as stated.
- Outcome
- Noted, no consequence
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Carter v. City of Buffalo, No. 25-CV-740 (W.D.N.Y.)2026-09-08 · US District Court, Western District of New York · WarningIn the US District Court for the Western District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Zakkiyya Carter used case law the court said did not support her propositions, after an earlier screening order. Judge John L. Si…
- Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…
- Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00855-JRR (D. Md.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, District of Maryland · WarningIn the District of Maryland, self-represented plaintiff Darrin Johnson again cited a case the court could not locate, after an earlier Rule 11 warning. Judge Rubin said the authority appeared to be hallucinated from gen…
- Potterf v. Wessels, No. 1:26-cv-10860-MFL-PTM (E.D. Mich.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · WarningIn the Eastern District of Michigan, self-represented plaintiffs admitted using artificial intelligence to draft objections with fictitious or erroneous citations and an invented Supreme Court quotation. Judge Leitman d…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Young v. Happy Money, Inc.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/james-c-young-tahnee-r-young-v-happy-money (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.