Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Juandel Pena and Martina Ruiz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

·United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida·US-FEDSanctionsprovisional

Southern District of Florida on 2026-02-19 in Juandel Pena and Martina Ruiz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. found the self-represented parties' reply misread Holden and cited a nonexistent page beyond the end of the Eleventh Circuit opinion. The magistrate judge recommended denying the renewed preliminary-injunction motion and warned that further false AI citations could require a sanctions hearing.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Date
2026-02-19
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
The self-represented parties' reply misread Holden and cited a nonexistent page beyond the end of the Eleventh Circuit opinion.
Outcome
Sanctions
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • De Ford v. Koutoulas, No. 6:22-cv-652-PGB-DCI (M.D. Fla.)2026-08-04 · US District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division · SanctionsIn the securities class action over the 'Let's Go Brandon' meme coin, the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida entered default judgment against promoter James Koutoulas as a terminating sanction. Judge P…
  • Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…
  • Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00855-JRR (D. Md.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, District of Maryland · WarningIn the District of Maryland, self-represented plaintiff Darrin Johnson again cited a case the court could not locate, after an earlier Rule 11 warning. Judge Rubin said the authority appeared to be hallucinated from gen…
  • Potterf v. Wessels, No. 1:26-cv-10860-MFL-PTM (E.D. Mich.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · WarningIn the Eastern District of Michigan, self-represented plaintiffs admitted using artificial intelligence to draft objections with fictitious or erroneous citations and an invented Supreme Court quotation. Judge Leitman d…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Juandel Pena and Martina Ruiz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/juandel-pena-and-martina-ruiz-v-wells-fargo-bank-n-a (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →