Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

·United States District Court for the District of Nebraska·US-FEDWarningprovisional

The District of Nebraska grants an EAJA fee request and cautions plaintiff’s counsel over a cited Peterson decision. The order says the Eighth Circuit citation does not exist, a similarly named case lacks the quoted language, and Nebraska’s AI rule requires verification.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Nebraska
Date
2026-08-06
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Plaintiff’s counsel cited a nonexistent Eighth Circuit Peterson decision and quoted language that appeared elsewhere in a legislative-history footnote.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services”, safelegalai.com/tracker/kadlaskar-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →