Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Martha Liliana Picon-Diaz et al. v. Pamela J. Bondi
·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·US-FEDWarningprovisional
Tenth Circuit on 2026-02-13 in Martha Liliana Picon-Diaz et al. v. Pamela J. Bondi found counsel's reply brief contained one citation defect, including Rodriguez-Romero v. Garland, 60 F.4th 1283 (10th Cir. 2023) and Rodriguez-Romero v. Garland, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations. The court warned counsel to verify legal authorities before future filings.
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
- Date
- 2026-02-13
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Counsel's reply brief contained one citation defect, including Rodriguez-Romero v. Garland, 60 F.4th 1283 (10th Cir. 2023) and Rodriguez-Romero v. Garland, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations.
- Outcome
- Warning
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Hill v. Foundation Media LLC, No. 1:25-cv-05947 (AS) (S.D.N.Y. 2026)2026-09-29 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York · WarningIn New York federal court, Judge Arun Subramanian ordered defence counsel to explain AI-affected quotations in a response brief, took no further action, and called the episode a wakeup call. Counsel's 1 October letter d…
- G.P. v. Jose Hernandez Arevalo, No. C26-284-KKE (W.D. Wash.)2026-09-08 · US District Court, Western District of Washington · WarningIn the US District Court for the Western District of Washington, plaintiff's counsel cited a nonexistent federal case in briefing against Turo. Judge Evanson described the citation as likely AI-fabricated, compelled arb…
- Williams v. Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board, No. 4:26-cv-00433-P (N.D. Tex.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Northern District of Texas · WarningIn the Northern District of Texas, plaintiffs' counsel cited nonexistent and materially inapposite cases while trying to defeat qualified immunity. Judge Pittman called the effort borderline sanctionable, warned that ge…
- Shelbert v. Baxter International, Inc., No. 1:26-cv-06266 (N.D. Ill.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, Northern District of Illinois · WarningIn the Northern District of Illinois, Tyler Shelbert's lawyer filed a motion to strike that relied on a false reading of Instituto Nacional de Comercializacion Agricola. Chief Judge Kendall inferred AI-assisted drafting…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Martha Liliana Picon-Diaz et al. v. Pamela J. Bondi”, safelegalai.com/tracker/martha-liliana-picon-diaz-et-al-v-pamela-j-bondi (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.