Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Martha Liliana Picon-Diaz et al. v. Pamela J. Bondi

·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·US-FEDWarningprovisional

Tenth Circuit on 2026-02-13 in Martha Liliana Picon-Diaz et al. v. Pamela J. Bondi found counsel's reply brief contained one citation defect, including Rodriguez-Romero v. Garland, 60 F.4th 1283 (10th Cir. 2023) and Rodriguez-Romero v. Garland, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations. The court warned counsel to verify legal authorities before future filings.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date
2026-02-13
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Counsel's reply brief contained one citation defect, including Rodriguez-Romero v. Garland, 60 F.4th 1283 (10th Cir. 2023) and Rodriguez-Romero v. Garland, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Martha Liliana Picon-Diaz et al. v. Pamela J. Bondi”, safelegalai.com/tracker/martha-liliana-picon-diaz-et-al-v-pamela-j-bondi (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →