Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Thanh Nguy v. Jabil Inc.

·U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California·US-FEDWarningprovisional

On 2026-04-07, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California declined to sanction counsel after a corrected brief was filed, but warned all parties to verify the existence and accuracy of cited authorities. Counsel submitted an opposition brief with fabricated or nonexistent authorities.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Date
2026-04-07
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
The opposition brief used fabricated or nonexistent authorities that the court found nonexistent, misquoted, or unsupported for the propositions asserted.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Thanh Nguy v. Jabil Inc.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/thanh-nguy-v-jabil-inc (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →