Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al.
·United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois·US-FEDWarningprovisional
Southern District of Illinois on 2026-03-10 in Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al. found the self-represented party's filing contained one citation defect involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations, mischaracterized authority. The court warned the self-represented party to verify legal authorities before future filings.
- Court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
- Date
- 2026-03-10
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- ChatGPT
- Conduct
- The self-represented party's filing contained one citation defect involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations, mischaracterized authority.
- Outcome
- Warning
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Johnson v. Dunn, No. 2:21-cv-01701-AMM (N.D. Ala.), 792 F. Supp. 3d 12412025-07-23 · US District Court, Northern District of Alabama (Southern Division) · SanctionsIn the Northern District of Alabama, Judge Anna M. Manasco publicly reprimanded Butler Snow attorneys Matthew B. Reeves, William J. Cranford and William R. Lunsford for filing two motions containing citations hallucinat…
- Mata v Avianca, Inc.2023-06-22 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · SanctionsThe origin case of legal AI hallucination sanctions: two New York attorneys were fined $5,000 after citing six ChatGPT-invented cases in a personal-injury filing and persisting after the fabrications were questioned, pr…
- Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…
- Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00855-JRR (D. Md.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, District of Maryland · WarningIn the District of Maryland, self-represented plaintiff Darrin Johnson again cited a case the court could not locate, after an earlier Rule 11 warning. Judge Rubin said the authority appeared to be hallucinated from gen…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/tina-rose-v-city-of-west-frankfort-et-al (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.