Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. v. Moos

·United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas·US-FEDWarningprovisional

The Northern District of Texas denies disqualification motions in a commercial dispute. The opinion notes briefing problems, including one nonexistent Northern District citation likely caused by imprudent generative-AI reliance, and admonishes pro hac vice counsel about responsible AI use and Rule 11 obligations.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Date
2026-07-28
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Pro hac vice counsel signed briefing citing a nonexistent N.D. Texas Aetna decision; only an unrelated D.N.J. case by that name existed.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. v. Moos”, safelegalai.com/tracker/transcontinental-realty-investors-inc-v-moos (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →