Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
United States v. Karnezis
·United States District Court for the District of Oregon·US-FEDWarningprovisional
The District of Oregon partially suppresses statements in a criminal case. In resolving the Miranda arguments, the court notes that defense briefing supplied a quotation that does not appear in Smith and admonishes counsel, while recording counsel’s statement that the mistake was not caused by generative AI.
- Court
- United States District Court for the District of Oregon
- Date
- 2026-07-31
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Defense counsel submitted a non-existent quotation from a Ninth Circuit Miranda case in suppression briefing.
- Outcome
- Warning
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Williams v. Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board, No. 4:26-cv-00433-P (N.D. Tex.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Northern District of Texas · WarningIn the Northern District of Texas, plaintiffs' counsel cited nonexistent and materially inapposite cases while trying to defeat qualified immunity. Judge Pittman called the effort borderline sanctionable, warned that ge…
- Shelbert v. Baxter International, Inc., No. 1:26-cv-06266 (N.D. Ill.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, Northern District of Illinois · WarningIn the Northern District of Illinois, Tyler Shelbert's lawyer filed a motion to strike that relied on a false reading of Instituto Nacional de Comercializacion Agricola. Chief Judge Kendall inferred AI-assisted drafting…
- Disruptive Resources, LLC v. Ballistic Barrier Products Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00321-JCG (D. Del.)2026-08-20 · US District Court for the District of Delaware (Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves, sitting by designation) · WarningIn a patent case in the US District Court for the District of Delaware, plaintiff's counsel promptly disclosed that a Strongsuit-assisted claim-construction brief contained errors. Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves discharged…
- Guerra-Quezada v. United States (with Guerra-Vasquez v. United States), Nos. 25-10372 and 25-10555 (5th Cir.)2026-08-14 · US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · WarningIn consolidated appeals by an uncle and nephew claiming US citizenship, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit identified fabricated quotations and misattributed authorities in both briefs, including language att…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “United States v. Karnezis”, safelegalai.com/tracker/united-states-v-karnezis (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.