Skip to content

Legal Tech / Contract review & due diligence

Lawgeex

Lawgeex (legacy brand) · HQ IL · founded 2014 · shut-down · Last checked 2026-10-05

Visit website

Last checked = the date we last re-opened the vendor's published pages. Facts are what the vendor documents, not what it claims in marketing.

Early AI contract-review pioneer; enterprise client group acquired by LegalSifter (Sept 2023) and assets reported sold to Robin AI (Feb 2023). Website still offers demos; founders run Superlegal.

Provisional entry: fewer than four governance facts are sourced yet. It is excluded from search indexes until verified.

Category
Contract review & due diligence · contract review, playbook redlining
Built for
In-house legal
Model providers (disclosed)
Not disclosed
Data residency options
United States, Israel, Germany, other locations
Pricing
enterprise
Markets
Not stated
Last checked
05 Oct 2026

What the vendor documents

Recorded from the vendor's own trust, privacy and terms pages. "Not disclosed" means we found no public statement, not that the control is absent.

No training on customer data
not disclosedsource
SOC 2
not disclosedsource
ISO 27001
documented yessource
ISO 42001
not disclosedsource
Zero retention with model providers
not disclosedsource
DPA offered
not disclosedsource
Private deployment
not disclosedsource

What the public documentation states

The remaining Lawgeex pages checked by the audit describe a contract-review service sold through order forms. The terms-and-conditions page says customers pay fees set in an Order Form and that service terms renew for the same duration unless 30 days' notice is given. The privacy policy, effective 1 January 2021, says Lawgeex may maintain, store and process personal data in the United States, Israel, Germany and other locations. It also says user personal data is retained as instructed or authorized by the customer and according to Lawgeex retention policy. The same terms permit anonymized information and data to be used to improve and enhance the services. The security page states ISO/IEC 27001 certification. SOC 2 and ISO 42001 were not published. The homepage referred to a Forrester 209% ROI and 6500+ hours-saved figure, but the method for that figure was not published. On 2026-10-05 lawgeex.com was live, carried a 2026 copyright and offered demo requests. A 25 September 2023 release from LegalSifter's investor says LegalSifter acquired a group of Lawgeex enterprise clients.

In the vendor's words

“We’re ISO/IEC-27001 certified”
Lawgeex Security
“maintain, store and process Personal Data in the United States, Israel, Germany, and other locations”
Privacy Policy, effective 1 January 2021
“use such anonymized information and data to improve and enhance the Services”
Terms and Conditions ROW
“automatically renew for additional periods of the same duration as the Service Term”
Terms and Conditions ROW

Not disclosed on public pages

"Not disclosed" records that no public statement was found where we looked, on the date shown. It does not assert that the control, term or figure is absent.

Not published on the pages we read on 2026-10-05: a DPA, named model providers, a public sub-processor list, terms update date, list price, seat minimum, encryption-at-rest detail, SOC 2, ISO 42001, customer-data training limits, private deployment, SAML SSO, zero retention and the method behind the Forrester figure. Procurement and DPIA checks use these items to document client confidentiality, GDPR Art. 28 flow-downs, access controls, retention and supervision duties.

Questions to put to the vendor

  1. Which entity now controls existing Lawgeex customer data and order forms after the asset transfers?
  2. Which model providers or analytics systems process Customer Data under the archived Lawgeex terms?
  3. Can the vendor provide a DPA and public sub-processor list for personal data stored in the US, Israel, Germany and other locations?
  4. What retention schedule applies when a customer ends an Order Form?
  5. What method supports the Forrester ROI and hours-saved figures?

Accuracy evidence

No published accuracy or hallucination evaluation found as of 2026-10-05.

Related incidents

No incidents are recorded for this tool as of 2026-10-05.

Ownership · ~$45M raised (Series C $20M, 2020); assets sold to Robin AI and LegalSifter in 2023.

Sources

Report an issue with this record →

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal Tech Tools, "Lawgeex", safelegalai.com/tools/lawgeex (last checked 2026-10-05, accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Also in Contract review & due diligence

SafeLegalAI is a research publication, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by SafeLegalAI. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.

Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.