Legal Tech / Contract review & due diligence
LexCheck
LexCheck, Inc. · HQ US · Last checked 2026-10-07
Last checked = the date we last re-opened the vendor's published pages. Facts are what the vendor documents, not what it claims in marketing.
AI contract review and redlining inside Microsoft Word against playbooks; SOC 2 Type II; AWS-hosted; DPA published.
Provisional entry: fewer than four governance facts are sourced yet. It is excluded from search indexes until verified.
- Category
- Contract review & due diligence · AI contract review, redlining, Word add-in
- Built for
- In-house legal
- Model providers (disclosed)
- Not disclosed
- Data residency options
- United States
- Pricing
- enterprise
- Markets
- US
- Last checked
- 07 Oct 2026
What the vendor documents
Recorded from the vendor's own trust, privacy and terms pages. "Not disclosed" means we found no public statement, not that the control is absent.
What the public documentation states
LexCheck's pages describe AI contract review and redlining inside Microsoft Word against playbooks. The DPA says LexCheck and its third parties process Customer Personal Data under customer instructions and that a list of third parties is available upon reasonable request; no public sub-processor list or model provider was published. The terms, last updated 13 January 2025, identify primary data centers in Northern Virginia and secondary data centers in Oregon, and the DPA says customer data may be processed in the United States. The security page states AES-256 at-rest encryption, regular penetration and vulnerability testing, and SOC 2 Type II accreditation. The security page also says customer data is only used to provide the service. The DPA requires notice of a Security Incident no later than 24 hours after LexCheck becomes aware of it and deletion within 90 days after termination or expiration. Pricing is by order form with auto-renewal for one-year periods unless 30 days' notice is given; no list price or seat minimum was published. The homepage states speed and cost-reduction figures, but no method was published.
In the vendor's words
“Customer data is only used to provide the service”
“LexCheck has achieved and maintains a SOC 2 Type II accreditation.”
“no later than 24 hours”
“within 90 days following termination or expiration”
Not disclosed on public pages
"Not disclosed" records that no public statement was found where we looked, on the date shown. It does not assert that the control, term or figure is absent.
Not published on the pages we read on 2026-09-06: model providers, a public sub-processor list, list price, seat minimum, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, private deployment, SAML SSO, zero retention and the method behind the homepage performance figures. Legal procurement and DPIA files normally need these details to confirm processor flow-downs, client-confidentiality controls, breach notice timing, residency, access controls and attorney supervision of redlines.
Questions to put to the vendor
- Which model providers, if any, process Client Data during Microsoft Word contract review?
- Can LexCheck provide the third-party list available upon request, including countries and objection periods?
- Can deletion occur sooner than 90 days after termination for high-confidentiality matters?
- What audit period and auditor are covered by the SOC 2 Type II accreditation?
- What test method supports the more-than-75-percent speed and more-than-50-percent cost figures?
- Is SAML SSO available, and on which order form terms?
Accuracy evidence
No published accuracy or hallucination evaluation found as of 2026-10-07.
Related incidents
No incidents are recorded for this tool as of 2026-10-07.
Sources
Report an issue with this record →
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal Tech Tools, "LexCheck", safelegalai.com/tools/lexcheck (last checked 2026-10-07, accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
Also in Contract review & due diligence
SafeLegalAI is a research publication, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by SafeLegalAI. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.
Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.