Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Hardy v. Genesee County Community Action Resource Department, et al. (2)

·U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan·US-FEDStrike-off / disbarmentprovisional

On 2026-04-06, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan struck the motion to consolidate and gave the plaintiff a final warning after he repeated fake quotations following an earlier AI-citation sanction order. A self-represented party submitted a motion with false quotations, including Berndt v. Tennessee does not appear in and United States v. Frazier does not appear in.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Date
2026-04-06
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
The motion used false quotations, including Berndt v. Tennessee does not appear in and United States v. Frazier does not appear in, which the court found nonexistent, misquoted, or unsupported.
Outcome
Strike-off / disbarment
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…
  • Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00855-JRR (D. Md.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, District of Maryland · WarningIn the District of Maryland, self-represented plaintiff Darrin Johnson again cited a case the court could not locate, after an earlier Rule 11 warning. Judge Rubin said the authority appeared to be hallucinated from gen…
  • Potterf v. Wessels, No. 1:26-cv-10860-MFL-PTM (E.D. Mich.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · WarningIn the Eastern District of Michigan, self-represented plaintiffs admitted using artificial intelligence to draft objections with fictitious or erroneous citations and an invented Supreme Court quotation. Judge Leitman d…
  • Turgeon v. FHLMC, No. 1:25-cv-00510-SM-TSM (D.N.H.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, District of New Hampshire · OtherIn the District of New Hampshire, self-represented debtor Noella Turgeon appealed a bankruptcy order that struck her objection after false, hallucinated citations. Judge McAuliffe held the bankruptcy court acted within…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Hardy v. Genesee County Community Action Resource Department, et al. (2)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/hardy-v-genesee-county-community-action-resource-department-et-al-2 (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →