Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Hong Chris Lu v. Capital One, N.A., et al.
·U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio·US-FEDDismissalprovisional
On 2026-03-25, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio dismissed the case with prejudice and treated the repeated fake cases in successive filings as a factor supporting dismissal. A self-represented party submitted an opposition brief with fabricated or nonexistent authorities.
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
- Date
- 2026-03-25
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- The opposition brief used fabricated or nonexistent authorities that the court found nonexistent, misquoted, or unsupported for the propositions asserted.
- Outcome
- Dismissal
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Thomas v. Pangburn, No. 4:23-cv-00046-RSB-CLR (CV423-046) (S.D. Ga.)2023-10-06 · US District Court, Southern District of Georgia (Savannah Division) · DismissalIn the Southern District of Georgia, Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray found that pro se plaintiff Jerry Thomas cited ten nonexistent cases and never explained their origin, recommended dismissal of his amended compla…
- Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…
- Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00855-JRR (D. Md.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, District of Maryland · WarningIn the District of Maryland, self-represented plaintiff Darrin Johnson again cited a case the court could not locate, after an earlier Rule 11 warning. Judge Rubin said the authority appeared to be hallucinated from gen…
- Potterf v. Wessels, No. 1:26-cv-10860-MFL-PTM (E.D. Mich.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · WarningIn the Eastern District of Michigan, self-represented plaintiffs admitted using artificial intelligence to draft objections with fictitious or erroneous citations and an invented Supreme Court quotation. Judge Leitman d…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Hong Chris Lu v. Capital One, N.A., et al.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/hong-chris-lu-v-capital-one-n-a-et-al (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.