Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Joshua Harris v. Pinnacle Bank
·United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi·US-FEDDismissalprovisional
The Northern District of Mississippi on 2026-05-07 dismissed the case with prejudice as a sanction for repeated fabricated citations and other Rule 11 violations in Joshua Harris v. Pinnacle Bank. The self-represented plaintiff filed a motion with three fabricated case citations, one false case quotation, four fabricated legal rules, and three misstated legal rules.
- Court
- United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
- Date
- 2026-05-07
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- The self-represented plaintiff filed a motion with three fabricated case citations, one false case quotation, four fabricated legal rules, and three misstated legal rules.
- Outcome
- Dismissal
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Thomas v. Pangburn, No. 4:23-cv-00046-RSB-CLR (CV423-046) (S.D. Ga.)2023-10-06 · US District Court, Southern District of Georgia (Savannah Division) · DismissalIn the Southern District of Georgia, Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray found that pro se plaintiff Jerry Thomas cited ten nonexistent cases and never explained their origin, recommended dismissal of his amended compla…
- Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…
- Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00855-JRR (D. Md.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, District of Maryland · WarningIn the District of Maryland, self-represented plaintiff Darrin Johnson again cited a case the court could not locate, after an earlier Rule 11 warning. Judge Rubin said the authority appeared to be hallucinated from gen…
- Potterf v. Wessels, No. 1:26-cv-10860-MFL-PTM (E.D. Mich.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · WarningIn the Eastern District of Michigan, self-represented plaintiffs admitted using artificial intelligence to draft objections with fictitious or erroneous citations and an invented Supreme Court quotation. Judge Leitman d…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Joshua Harris v. Pinnacle Bank”, safelegalai.com/tracker/joshua-harris-v-pinnacle-bank (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.