Incident Tracker / United States (federal)
Perry v. Merrick Bank Corporation
·United States District Court for the District of Arizona·US-FEDDismissalprovisional
On 2026-06-09, in Perry v. Merrick Bank Corporation, the District of Arizona dismissed the complaint without leave to amend and noted the plaintiff's prior hallucinated citations in related litigation. A self-represented litigant filed a response using quotations that did not appear in the cited source and at least one nonexistent or hallucinated authority.
- Court
- United States District Court for the District of Arizona
- Date
- 2026-06-09
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- The order cited a related Perry case in which the pro se plaintiff had filed at least one hallucinated citation and fake quotations misattributed to real cases. The current dismissal and denial of leave rested on preclusion, futility, and similar litigation tactics.
- Outcome
- Dismissal
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-08
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Thomas v. Pangburn, No. 4:23-cv-00046-RSB-CLR (CV423-046) (S.D. Ga.)2023-10-06 · US District Court, Southern District of Georgia (Savannah Division) · DismissalIn the Southern District of Georgia, Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray found that pro se plaintiff Jerry Thomas cited ten nonexistent cases and never explained their origin, recommended dismissal of his amended compla…
- Carter v. City of Buffalo, No. 25-CV-740 (W.D.N.Y.)2026-09-08 · US District Court, Western District of New York · WarningIn the US District Court for the Western District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Zakkiyya Carter used case law the court said did not support her propositions, after an earlier screening order. Judge John L. Si…
- Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…
- Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00855-JRR (D. Md.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, District of Maryland · WarningIn the District of Maryland, self-represented plaintiff Darrin Johnson again cited a case the court could not locate, after an earlier Rule 11 warning. Judge Rubin said the authority appeared to be hallucinated from gen…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Perry v. Merrick Bank Corporation”, safelegalai.com/tracker/perry-v-merrick-bank-corporation (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.